This website is an initiative of J-Lab

Principles of Citizen Journalism

Accuracy & fact-checking: How to get it right

navigation thumbnails
Accuracy
navigation thumbnails
Thoroughness
navigation thumbnails
Fairness
navigation thumbnails
Transparency
navigation thumbnails
Independence
navigation thumbnails
Resources

The team behind this project

SECTIONS

Accuracy & fact-checking
How to get it right

Thoroughness
Going the extra yard for information

Fairness
Treating opposing points of view with respect

Transparency
Disclosure a key ingredient in gaining trust

Independence
Following the story wherever it leads

Interviews
Tapping into the wisdom of the community

Resources
Where to find more information

Washingtonpost.com’s corrections policy

We noticed that the Washington Post doesn’t change a mistake made after publishing an article, but instead opts to append a correction at the top of stories, like this one.

Washington Post correction

Washingtonpost.com executive editor Jim Brady sent the following email explaining the reasoning for the online newspaper’s policy:

We handle corrections a few different ways, with the goal of each being to inoculate ourselves against the charge of whitewashing our errors. In the web world, as you know, when you change articles and don’t acknowledge it, people will notice and the conspiracy theories then begin. So we handle them in three different ways:

1) a non-essential typo (wrong verb tense, extraneous letters in a word, juxtaposed letters, etc.), we will just fix and not acknowledge.

2) an essential typo (a misspelled name, wrong dollar figure, etc.), we will fix the mistake in the article and add a correction at the top acknowledging the mistake and letting readers know we have fixed it in the story itself.

3) in cases where changing the article itself is either difficult or not a good use of limited resources, we will just append the correction to the top of the article and not fix the text itself. We do this for older articles, articles we’re no longer promoting or articles in which the correction would require a more significant rewrite than a simple typo. This way, the correction is there but we don’t have to spend time on rewrites or tweaking articles that aren’t getting any traffic.

Photos across top of page (from left to right) by Rob Milsom, Tom Magliery, Elaine Yeung, Stefan Jansson, Geren W. Mortensen, Jr., John Cumisky